Report: Global Biodiversity Down
30 Percent in 40
Years
By Stephanie Pappas, LiveScience Senior
Writer | LiveScience.com
The world's biodiversity is down 30 percent since
the 1970s, according to a new report, with tropical
species taking the biggest hit. And if
humanity continues as it has been, the picture could get bleaker.
Humanity is outstripping the Earth's resources by 50
percent — essentially using the resources of one and a half Earths every year,
according to the 2012 Living Planet
Report, produced by conservation agency the World Wildlife Fund (WWF).
Colby Loucks, the
director of conservation sciences at WWF, compared humanity to bad houseguests.
"We're emptying the fridge, we're not really taking
care of the lawn, we're not weeding the flower beds and we're certainly not
taking out the garbage," Loucks said.
Burning through resources
The biannual Living
Planet report is designed to call
attention to the Earth's "invisible economy," said Emily McKenzie,
the director of the WWF's Natural Capital Program. Natural resources —
and the rate at which humans
burn through them — rarely appear on
policymakers' balance sheets, McKenzie said.
But humanity is essentially in debt to Mother Earth,
conservationists find. As of 2008, the most recent year for which data is
available, humans were outstripping Earth's biocapacity by 50 percent.
Biocapacity is the amount of renewable resources, land, and waste absorption
(such as sinks for carbon dioxide) the Earth can provide. In other words, it
takes the planet 1.5 years to restore what humanity burns through in a year.
(The organization Global Footprint Network marks "Earth
Overshoot Day" every year to draw
attention to how fast humans use natural resources. In 2011, Earth Overshoot
Day fell on Sept. 27, the day humans used up Earth's annual resources.)
The report scientists calculated the world's hogs when it
comes to resources (called the ecological
footprint) by determining each nation's
productive land capacity and comparing it to the actual population and
consumption per person. The United States has the fifth-largest ecological
footprint of any nation on Earth, according to the report.
In order from most to least, the top 10 greediest resource users
per capita are:
- Qatar
- Kuwait
- United Arab Emirates
- Denmark
- United States
- Belgium
- Australia
- Canada
- The Netherlands
- Ireland
Struggling species
All of this resource use is taking a toll. The Living
Planet report also tracks biodiversity and species populations across the
globe. This year's report details a startling loss
of biodiversity around the globe: A loss of
30 percent of biodiversity on average, meaning a major decline in the number of
different species of plants, animals and other organisms. Temperate species are
doing relatively well, Loucks said, but tropical species have declined by 60
percent since the 1970s. Freshwater tropical species are the hardest-hit,
having declined by 70 percent in that time period.
Globally, terrestrial species declined by 25 percent between 1970
and 2008, WWF reports. Marine (non-freshwater) species declined by 20 percent.
Many of the group's proposed solutions to humanity's
out-of-control resource use center around
Rio+20, the upcoming United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development set
for June 20, 2012. The meeting is designed to help create pathways for
sustainable development in the future, said Kate Newman, WWF's managing
director of public sector initiatives. She cited the example of Mozambique, a
poor country that may be home to one of the largest natural gas fields in the
world. As international companies arrive to exploit this resource, local
planners are concerned about how to make sure the entire nation benefits,
she
said.
In the same way, global decision-makers need to think long-term,
Loucks said.
"As we're approaching a planet with 9 billion people on it,
we need to find a global solution," he said. "The challenge for us is
this is a long-term problem. This is the Earth for millennia. We need to move
beyond the election cycle, beyond the quarterly report cycle."
No comments:
Post a Comment